Ablative CO2 Laser V.S Non-Ablative Lase MD Ultra
- Erin Prichard
- 5 days ago
- 1 min read

Struggling to choose between Ablative CO2 Laser and Non-Ablative Lase MD Ultra? Here’s the Key Differences:
🔥 Ablative CO2 Laser
✅ Pros:
- Highly effective for treating:
- Dyspigmentation** (sun spots, age spots).
- Skin laxity.
- Deep wrinkles (rhytids)and atrophic acne scarring
❌ Cons:
- Higher risk of complications: scarring, hyper/hypopigmentation, infection.
- Not suitable for darker skin types (Fitzpatrick IV–VI).
- Longer downtime: 7–14 days (redness, peeling).
- More discomfort during treatment.
✨ Non-Ablative Lase MD Ultra
✅ Pros:
- Safe for all skin types, including darker tones (Fitzpatrick I–VI).
- Minimal to no downtime.
- More comfortable treatment vs. ablative lasers.
- Treats:
- Pigmentation (melasma, PIH, sun spots, age spots).
- Acne scars**, enlarged pores, bruising.
- Hair regrowth & scalp revitalization.
❌ Cons:
- Less aggressive than CO2—requires 3–5 sessions for optimal results.
💡 Which Laser Should You Choose?
- CO2 Laser: Ideal for deep resurfacing if you have lighter skin and can tolerate downtime.
- Lase MD Ultra: Best for subtle, gradual improvements with minimum downtime and all skin types.
🏷️ LIMITED-TIME OFFER:
Book a FREE laser consultation this month and get 10% OFF your first treatment!
📞 Call 0493263319 | 🌐 Learn more
Comments